Tuesday, December 24, 2019

A Rape On Campus A Brutal Assault And Struggle For Justice

Savannah Schulte Psychology 1010 Professor Slatcher 4 December 2014 Extra Credit Research Paper Recently while reading Rolling Stone and looking for an article for this paper, and came across an article called â€Å"A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA.† In summary, a freshman at the University of Virginia was at a frat party and her date was a member of that certain frat. She chose against drinking which is uncommon in most rape cases that occur on campuses. He later asks her to join him upstairs, and being an innocent naà ¯ve girl she decided to follow him. As soon as she entered the dark room and he did not turn on the lights she knew that something was wrong. Soon after she heard many different voices in the room and after seven different frat boys did horrid things to her she understood that this was something that some of these boys were doing this as an initiation into that frat. Of course, her friends who were so-called ‘loyal’ to their college urged her to keep quiet for fear that â€Å"she may never be allowed in a f rat again† or â€Å"put a bad light on the university.† Furthermore, the UVA is under a federal investigation to try to determine if there have been other cases of rape that may have been ‘swept under the rug.’ In this essay I want to investigate the psychology of rape and the rapist, why it happens largely in college campuses and specifically fraternities, and also to understand the â€Å"rape culture.† First, theShow MoreRelatedInformation Technology Does More Goods Than Harms5156 Words   |  21 Pagesdominant in the midst of social disorder. Some even serve as socialization groups that initiate men and women into adulthood as in Poro and Mende societies in Sierra Leone and the Oviaosese in Ogori land.      Origin of Campus Cults    What is known as secret cult in tertiary institutions started at University College, Ibadan in 1953. it was formed by nigeria’s only nobel laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Aig-Imoukhuede, Pius Oleghe, Ralph Opara, Nat Oyelola and Prof. MuyiwaRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagestold the police that Mayfield ran up his apartments steps sometime around 2 a.m. that night. What else do we know that can be considered as evidence against Mayfield? Let’s see. Mayfield has no record of robbery, but he was convicted of minor assault against a neighbor six years ago. Well, thats about it. Does that make the case for the prosecution? 16 Dr. White: Yes, hes guilty; theres no other explanation for the evidence. I say we vote right now. Jones: Hold it, Doc. There is another

Monday, December 16, 2019

The American Tactics of the Revolutionary War Free Essays

string(46) " town and half to the front side of the town\." Most of Europe thought that the British with their immense amount of capital, soldiers and supplies would beat the American resistance in the American revolutionary war without much of an effort. However the Patriots realized, from their earliest difficulties, to capitalize on the enemys weaknesses. Guerrilla warfare and a strategy that emanated from the ability to manipulate events to their own benefit enabled the Americans to defeat the ostensibly more powerful British. We will write a custom essay sample on The American Tactics of the Revolutionary War or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Americans suffered great abuse from their mother country. The British laid upon the Americans heavy taxes between the years 1764 to the middle of 1776. They created such taxes in the Sugar Act, Townshend Act, Tea Act, the Intolerable Acts and many other acts. These acts over the course of the years destroyed much of the faith that Americans had in the British government. The greater portion of the population thought the British were inadequate rulers and that they could do a much better job in ruling themselves. The Americans were tired of the Quartering Act which let British troops be housed in their own homes. They didnt enjoy housing British troops so that their families could be spied upon or have their children raped. The least the Americans thought they deserved was the right to have a representation in Parliament and the right to settle the land over the Appalachian Mountains. If the farmers could have more land to work on, the Americans could have a surplus of food to ship to other countries creating a better economy for the American people. Over the course of about twenty-five years the Americans sent over 500 bills to the British House Of Trade trying to repeal the economic acts that Britain laid down upon them. The Americans also tried to convince the British to let them have the ability to trade with other countries. If the British would have allowed this the common people of American would have been doing better economically; the percent of poor people would have been lowered greatly and the average income would have gone up a great deal. The reason it would have gone up so much is that Britain controlled the prices of products. The British decided how much they would buy a product for from the Americans and charge them two or three times as much to buy it back. All the American people really wanted was to be treated properly. As Thomas Paine said in Common Sense the British treated the Americans like an abusive mother would treat her child. Due to the economic hardships the Americans suffered they knew that they were going to face many problems in the war. The Americans knew that the British had a larger supply of men ranging from more experienced generals to more soldiers. The British had such a surplus of income from all of their colonies that they were able hire and supply mercenaries from Germany to come and fight in America. They had a stronger navy and a lot more artillery than the Americans had. The Americans faced many other disadvantages such as lack of guns, ammunition, food, clothing, and most of all they were heavily outnumbered by men. The British had most advantages except for three main things. The first of all the British had a harder time setting up their supply line because they were so far away from any major base. Their main head quarters was on Long Island. The British had a difficult time setting up a supply line outside of New York and New Jersey to feed, clothe, and keep in contact with their men. The second disadvantage was that the American generals knew the land and terrain where they were fighting a lot better then the British generals did. The American Generals knew how to deal with certain weather issues and turned it to their advantage. The Americans could plan out strategies based on land and terrain rather than sheer numbers, which is how the British tried to deal with the patriots. The third and probably one of the most important British disadvantages that they faced was that the Patriots had more desire to win. The soldiers knew that they were defending their land, their families, and they were protecting their desires. The British soldiers were fighting for what most of them considered to be nothing. Most of the British soldiers were tired of fighting in America and wanted to go home and see their families or create and have a family. The Americans at the beginning of the war tried a certain style of warfare known as Jomini warfare. The two enemies would decide when to have a battle and attack each other. The two enemies would charge at each other, shoot and hope that the basic strategy that was planned at the beginning would hold out. Much less strategy was used and involved in a battle such as this. The only problem with this style of warfare for the Americans was that in certain battles the British sometimes outnumbered them four to one. One such battle that proved that the Americans could not beat the British using European warfare was in the Battle of Brandywine. Washington was trying to keep the British from overtaking Philadelphia and at least give the Continental Congress time to leave Philadelphia before they were attacked. Washington with a force of 11,000 men thought he could take on General Howe. Howe divided his army and over took Washington with a flanking maneuver and forced Washington to retreat. Washington had lost about a thousand men. This battle proved to Washington how he needed a strategy that would not have them going into a man to man combat situation where numbers were the main deciding factor. He tried to overtake General Howe at Germantown in fog by sending half of his army to the backside of the town and half to the front side of the town. You read "The American Tactics of the Revolutionary War" in category "Essay examples" The army failed to move properly so Washington lost the battle of Germantown but it prevented Howe not to have another assault on Philadelphia that year. Even though Washington lost this battle it was a victory for him personally as a commander and for the army. It proved to the Americans how they could not face the British in direct man to man combat and forced them to form new methods to fight the British so that they could survive. The Americans created new strategies in order to overcome their enemies and capitalize on their weaknesses. The native people coined this new strategy called guerrilla warfare. The basis of this style of warfare is to quickly attack your enemy and run away. The Americans carefully selected their battleground and time of attack as much as possible in guerrilla warfare so that they could have every advantage possible so that they could have a chance to win. Two such instances where the time of day and choice of terrain were the complete reasons for British defeat were at Stony Point and at Paulus Hook. The battle at Stony Point took place on the night of July fifteenth and ended the morning of July sixteenth. Washington assigned Mad Anthony Wayne to this attack. Wayne had 1,350 men that were given to him for this attack. He set his men in two tight lines and marched towards the fort in and camouflaged by the night darkness. The first men to raid the fort attacked with their bayonets. The British fort soon went into chaos and surrendered very quickly. In total this battle cost the Americans 15 lives, they killed 63 British soldiers, and General Clinton was forced to surrender the fort to the Americans. Another battle that was won by time of day and terrain was in Paulus Hook, New Jersey. Harry Lee took a small squad and attacked the 200 men post. He attacked at dawn and caught the British completely off guard and shocked them. He killed or captured almost everybody at the fort. He retreated with everyone within two hours of the attack to make sure no British reinforcements arrived. There were many different guerilla warfare styles and strategies over the course of the revolutionary war. One such strategy was to have two rows of riflemen fire and then run away. The British would then try to catch them and the troops would be lead into a trap waiting for them. Two of the best, and most successful, uses of this strategy were at the Battle of Cowpens and the Battle at Guilford Court. The Battle of Cowpens physically took place on January 17 but was set up between January 2,1781 and the day of the actual battle on January 17. The battle of Cowpens was a major battle of the war against the British for conquest as much as morals. Previous to the battle General Greene had separated his army of about 1,700 into two divisions. His army would have 1,100 and General Morgan would have about 600 men. General Cornwallis thought this to be a very foolish move and sent out Banastre Trarleton, one of the most fearsome British officers with 1,100 men. Morgan knew he would lose against Trarleton at his present so he traveled to Cowpens South Carolina to wait for the onslaught that they knew was coming. On the way to Cowpens Morgan picked up enough men to almost evenly match the British man for man. He knew that Trarleton would attack frontally so he prepared a strategy that would be able to handle it. He knew and planned on the fact that his militia would retreat at first sign of charge so he laid out a strategy that would take this into account. He had his militia stand in two rows. All of the militia that were in the rows were instructed to fire twice and leave. This strategy worked better then Morgan could have ever planned. His two rows of men, totaling about 400 men knocked back and completely destroyed the first British charge and then the militia retreated. Leaving his other men to charge at the British, General Morgan completely humiliated Trarleton. Morgan had killed or captured more than three fourths of his force. Trarleton had only escaped with 140 horsemen. The same strategy was implemented at the battle at Guilford Court. British General Cornwallis wanted revenge on General Morgan for what he did to the British at Cowpens. So Cornwallis had his army of 2,500 men trail General Morgans army who chose to go north after their victory and rejoin with General Greenes army. He trailed their army for nearly two months and after losing at least 500 men trailing Morgan and Greene, he decided to go in a complete circle back to Hillsborough. There General Nathan Greene was waiting for him. He had applied their previous strategy in the battle at Cowpens to this battle. General Greene started with 2,000 men after the Battle at Cowpens and had increased his numbers up to over 4,500 men. He decided to place a good number of his militia in two forward lines and the continental part of his army in a third row. He called Colonel Washington to protect his left flank and Light Horse Harry Lee to protect his right flank. After the quick attack Greene decided to leave and not pursue a fight. He knew that the losses that they would have suffered would not have been worth the fight but during this battle they killed about 300 British troops. This battle at Guilford Court caused Cornwallis to retreat all the way back to Wilmington and then to Virginia where the demise of the British was. Another reason the Americans won certain battles over the British army was that the British did not take the American resistance with total seriousness causing them to do some stupid things do to poor judgement. One example of a battle when the British lost due to their stupidity was in the Battle at Bennington. The British were heading towards Vermont to obtain horses, food, and other supplies to aid the German mercenaries who had been without horses for a great length of time. Lieutenant Colonel Fredrich Baum was instructed not to risk heavy losses but to scare and despoil the Vermonters. Baum left his camp with about 700 men and two cannons, which was thought to be more than enough to fight any small resistance that they might face. His first defiance of his orders was when Baum encountered a force of 200 men sent by Brigadier General John Stark. After the battle he was informed that these men were part of a militia force gathering at Bennington. He decided to press towards Bennington and destroy the force, even though it went against his orders again. Baum then marched towards Bennington. On his way there Baum saw two contingents of men going towards his rear and presumed that they were Tories that were going to flank the enemy and didnt give them a second thought after seeing them. When Baum approached Bennington, Stark order his men in front to charge, at the same time the two contingents of men already behind Baum also attack him and Baum was massacred. If Baum had taken any care as to even think of the contingents traveling behind him he could have possibly beaten the Americans at Bennington. But because of his disobedience of orders and his ignorance he lost the battle. The British, with all their money, men, supplies, and power couldnt overcome what little the Americans had. The Patriots realized, from their earliest difficulties, to capitalize on the enemys weakness. The Americans devised new tactics to overcome the British in their traditional Jomini style of warfare. The Americans used all that they possibly had to beat British. What drove the Americans to create these new strategies, though, was their desire; their desire to overcome the British is what gave the colonial fighters their true advantage during the American Revolutionary War. How to cite The American Tactics of the Revolutionary War, Essay examples

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Customer loyalty through social networks - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss about theCustomer loyalty through social networks. Answer: Understanding the Marketing Strategy of Gap Inc. Diversification is one of the chief marketing strategy of Gap Inc. Being a highly well-known company, Gaps marketing strategy is to capture a broad demographic of consumers (Caniato et al. 2012). The company is one of the four largest retailers dominating the apparel market of U.S. The company has five brands since 2010, namely, Old Navy, Banana Republic, Atheleta, Gap and Piperlime. This diversification is done in order to attract consumers having different taste of fashion and style. While Gap targets consumers who prefer classically styled casual apparel within a moderate cost range, Old Navy focuses on fun, value and fashion for young consumers and family. Apart from reasonably priced casual family apparel, Old Navy also offers shoes, maternity wear, various personal care items and accessories to the consumers. Banana Republic deals with highly sophisticated tailored and casual apparels, accessories, shoes and personal care products targeting the higher middle class and elite con sumers of US (Arrigo 2013). The brand Athlete offers high quality athletic apparels for women and the cost range is little higher. Apart from these four brands that are available in the offline stores, Gap Inc also has a brand called Piperlime which is an online store which offers both casual and high end fashion footwear and handbag to men, women and children. While this diversification strategy for market expansion of Gap was initially successful, in the middle of 20s, the company lost a good number of consumers (Galbreth and Ghosh 2013). Clients of the company got confused and eventually frustrated due to the complicated diversification of the company. This result in loss of consumers and the company is still struggling to gain back its consumer loyalty. Chief Competitor of Gap Inc. among HM and Zara Considering the fact that Gap Inc is facing a huge lot of competition, Zara is considered to be the chief competition of the Gap Inc. In 2008, Inditex, the parent company of Zara has officially overtaken Gap Inc. and has become the worlds biggest fashion retailer. The main reason behind Zaras success is the multi-pronged approach of Inditex that creates a closed loop. The company is very fast to get fashion to stores. The strategy of the company of utilizing the shipping containers when sending back unsold merchandise for recycling purpose, has not only reduced the manufacture cost of the company but also has gained consumers attention as an eco friendly act. Besides that, Zara has expanded it business all over the world and has registered a commendable profit of 6.3 billion dollar. Zara has reported to be responsible for 66 percent of the overall growth of Inditex, the expansion of the company is touching a new high (Kapferer and Bastien 2012). Another reason for the rapid growth of Zara is considered to be its social media advertisements. According to survey, before the emergence of social media, I was not possible for consumers to follow the latest trends in the market. However, due to its 24*7 presence in social media, Zara is successfully attracting consumers with their highly updated fashion apparels and accessories. The credit goes to highly successful business model of Zara that keeps the consumers stick to the brand (Gamboa and Gonalves 2014). On the other hand, the story of Gap is completely different from that of Zara. Out of the five brands of Gap Inc., only Banana Republic has performed well in the market. Old Navy, the brand that sells apparel and accessories at a cheaper rate is still struggling to obtain consumer equity. Products that gap should introduce and withdrawal to enhance its competitive edge. Considering the fact that Gap Inc. is gradually losing its consumers in the international market, new market strategies including addition and removal of products is required to cope up with the current market situation. One of the chief reasons behind Gaps decision to close 25 percent of its North American Stores is issues with its womens wear. The womens wear with knits and woven were manufactured during the winter (Jin et al. 2012). Majority of the consumer did not like the collection due to the poor fitting and unappealing esthetic. Negative feedbacks from the collection shook up the entire management team of Gap and the whole issue resulted in departure of Gaps Creative director Rebecca Bay. Another issue was the crop tops of the brand Banana Republic. Even the brand president Andi Owen accepted the fact that the company had made a too large bet on Crop tops. According to Owen, the crop top collection not only lacks color varation and has chiefly focused on black and white, but also is boxy and oversized. All this disasters has not only imposed negative impact on the profit market of Gap Inc but has also resulted in loss of a huge amount of customer loyalty. Considering the fact that the company is still struggling to get back its equity, it is high time for Gap Inc to introduce new products in its collection to attract consumers. Since Zara is currently ruling the apparel market, Gap can look into their popular products collections like leather plaited shopper bag, Navy double-breasted blazer or casual apparels like embroidered boho jackets with pompoms, which are currently in rage (Kim and Ko 2012). Part from this, since consumers are highly getting inclined towards animal printed coats and jackets, Gap Inc can manufacture this product with a twist of their own innovative ideas. SWOT Analysis of Gap Inc. Strengths Dealership Teamwork of Gap is strong and hence the company can reach easily to Global consumers. Being an experienced apparel industry, Gap has good Working knowledge. This helps the company to adapt the current trends easily. Apart from apparels and accessories, the company also produces baby products. Considering the fact that baby products are always in demand irrespective of market fluctuations, this can be considered as strength of Gap Inc (Cortez et al. 2014). Efficient marketing through television, online and print media is another strength of the brand. The brand manufactures several times less iconic products and has a reputation of selling products that are long lasting and durable. Weaknesses Highly competitive market along with limited market share has resulted in loosing consumers and therefore decrement of overall profit of the company (Gap.com. 2018). Excessive fragmentation of the brands has imposed negative impact on the company since the good number of consumers switched to other brands due to confusion and frustration. High dependence of the company on external manufactures is another weakness of Gap Inc. The company is failing to utilize social media and online marketing efficiently. As a result, it is failing to stay updated with current consumers choices and thus is loosing the market since past five years. Opportunities The company should work on increasing its social media efficiency and online marketing in order to understand the requirement of its consumers and to enhance its consumer loyalty. Considering the fact that the company has still not expanded itself in global market, it should open stores globally keeping the market of Asia and China as its chief focus. The company should merge with other fashion houses to boost sales. To increase consumer loyalty the company can get its brands endorsed by popular celebrities. Threats Highly efficient global competitors like Zara and HM offer more fashionable clothing in a much lesser value. This is one of the major threats for the company. Another major threat for the company is that the management of Gap Inc is still struggling to turn around the business. Increased labor costs, risky global sourcing and manufacturing along with rapids changes in the fashion industry are other factors that can be considered as threats for the company. Four Ps for Gap Inc concerning UAE Market Marketing mix of Gap Inc analyses and explain the market strategy of the company that is needed to expand its business in UAE with the help of 4 Ps namely, Product, Price, Place and Promotion (Armstrong et al. 2015). Product Being a well-known international apparel and accessories company, Gap Inc offers products like jeans, jackets and T-shirts for daily life usage and in accessories they provide handbags, shoes, jewelry, sunglasses and perfumes. In order to expand its business successfully in UAE market, Gap needs to introduce conservative and multiple layer clothes beside their original apparel collection (Khan, Rodrigues and Balasubramanian 2017). Gap can introduced popular women and men wear like Shayla that is a popular traditional scarf and disdisha in its collection to attract consumers in UAE. Short or body revealing dresses are strictly prohibited in UAE. Thus Gap should keep in mind that UAE will not provide a good market for short skirts or hot pants (Fernandes 2013). Price Considering the fact that Gap targets a vast range of consumers from middle class to elite financial condition, it will not be tough for the company to attract consumers in UAE. Initially the chief target of the company was elite consumers (Baker 2014). Since 2014, Gap understood that consumers are getting inclined towards affordable products and hence it changed it strategy of pricing its products. Place Being a popular company, Gap has a vast distribution network and a huge global presence. There are over 3700 stores of Gap across the world. In UAE, the major marketing of Gap is performed through online marketing. Offline stores of Gap are available in metro cities like Dubai. Promotion In UAE, the company uses several numbers of promotional techniques like offering e-gift cards or offline cards, which can be used in any stores within UAE. Other promotional techniques of Gap Inc include online and print media advertising. The company also organizes competitions and uses their own products as gifts (Okonkwo 2016). Suggested Advertisement Strategy for Gap Inc One of the chief strategies that need to be implemented by the company is to efficiently use the social media as a online marketing platform. Gap needs to post more advertisements in Facebook and Instagram not only to attract consumers but also to understand the requirements of `consumers of UAE. Apart from this, the company can offer special discounts, e-gift cards and gifts to consumers. Another major strategy that can be implemented by the company is endorsement of itself by well-known celebrities and sponsoring popular fashion shows. Reference Armstrong, G., Kotler, P., Harker, M. and Brennan, R., 2015.Marketing: an introduction. Pearson Education. Arrigo, E., 2013. Corporate responsibility management in fast fashion companies: the Gap Inc. case.Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal,17(2), pp.175-189. Baker, M.J., 2014.Marketing strategy and management. Palgrave Macmillan. Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L. and Moretto, A., 2012. Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research.International journal of production economics,135(2), pp.659-670. Cortez, M.A., Tu, N.T., Van Anh, D., Ng, B.Z. and Vegafria, E., 2014. Fast fashion quadrangle: An analysis.Academy of Marketing Studies Journal,18(1), p.1. Fernandes, C., 2013. Analysis of counterfeit fashion purchase behaviour in UAE.Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal,17(1), pp.85-97 Galbreth, M.R. and Ghosh, B., 2013. Competition and sustainability: The impact of consumer awareness.Decision Sciences,44(1), pp.127-159. Gamboa, A.M. and Gonalves, H.M., 2014. Customer loyalty through social networks: Lessons from Zara on Facebook.Business Horizons,57(6), pp.709-717. Gap.com. (2018).Shop Women, Men, Maternity, Baby Kids Clothes Online | Gap. [online] Available at: https://www.gap.com/ [Accessed 4 Jan. 2018]. Jin, B., Jung, H., Matthews, D.R. and Gupta, M., 2012. Fast fashion business model: what, why and how?. InFashion supply chain management: Industry and business analysis(pp. 193-211). IGI Global. Kapferer, J.N. and Bastien, V., 2012.The luxury strategy: break the rules of marketing to build luxury brands. Kogan page publishers. Khan, Z.R., Rodrigues, G. and Balasubramanian, S., 2017. Ethical consumerism and apparel industry-towards a new factor model. Kim, A.J. and Ko, E., 2012. Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand.Journal of Business Research,65(10), pp.1480-1486. Okonkwo, U., 2016.Luxury fashion branding: trends, tactics, techniques. Springer..Luxury fashion branding: trends, tactics, techniques. Springer.

Sunday, December 1, 2019

The world summit Essay Example

The world summit Essay The world summit is an event that takes place once every year and is an event where all the world leaders get together and discuss what is wrong with our planet. They then discuss how to make it better. The broadsheet article is slightly biased against America, as it says, police manhandled protestors. This is using the word manhandled meaning that they disapprove and may favour the opinion of the protestors. The tabloid article is not biased towards or against any of the sides at the world summit. I do think that the broadsheet is not unfair to be biased against America because, as it states in their article, America is the worlds number one polluter, yet they are not doing much about it. This is a proved, certifies fact and although the article contains many facts, it also has quite a few opinions as well. When they start with the sentence, the earth summit ended amid chaos and acrimony, they make it sound as if it is much worse than it actually is. Also, when it mentions how the police manhandled protestors, it could have just said something like , removed, or ushered out, but they chose to write manhandled which is much more aggressive, therefore being what they think really happened as opposed to what did happen. Also, it says in the second paragraph, Kofi Annan, the united national secretary general was left insisting that the $50 million (i 33 million) summit wad not a failure. They could have left the facts about the summits cost out of it but they kept it in to emphasize how much of a ridiculous amount of money was spent on it and how it was a failure. We will write a custom essay sample on The world summit specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The world summit specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The world summit specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In fact, it seems it was a failure. Although they spent so much money on it, they only reached two firm targets; to reduce the number of people without access to sanitation by half by 2015 and setting up marine reserves by 2012. Others such as banning toxic chemicals and protecting fish stocks, have been heavily qualified. Other promises in the final agreement are repeats of previous declarations or represent a weakening of earlier deals. The headline or title of the article is, US critics jeer Powell as summit ends on discord. This sums up the way the protestors acted and how they did a mass walkout about the way they disapproved of what Powell was saying. Also they mention that summit ends in discord, which means that they sort of agree that it was a waste of time and that not enough was done at this years world summit because although there was something done, it was not enough, therefore agreeing with the protestors that it was a complete and utter waste of time and money. The sub-heading reads, Powells speech makes clear that Bush has written off the planet and has abdicated world leadership. The speech obviously does not actually say this in these words, it is just summing up what it is basically saying, it is merely unfortunate that this message is coming across, although this may be the broadsheet newspaper twisting what Powells speech says to make it to be what they want to hear, This is by far changing the truth but then keeping all the basic facts in place.